↓ Skip to main content

大腰筋機能の臨床的考察(二足歩行と大腰筋)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Society of Biomechanisms, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
大腰筋機能の臨床的考察(二足歩行と大腰筋)
Published in
Journal of the Society of Biomechanisms, January 2000
DOI 10.3951/sobim.24.153
Authors

福井 勉

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,801,827
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Society of Biomechanisms
#9
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,831
of 110,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Society of Biomechanisms
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them