↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive decline in prodromal Huntington Disease: implications for clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cognitive decline in prodromal Huntington Disease: implications for clinical trials
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, August 2013
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane S Paulsen, Megan M Smith, Jeffrey D Long, the PREDICT HD investigators and coordinators of the Huntington Study Group

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the feasibility of preventive clinical trials in prodromal Huntington disease (HD). A primary limitation is a lack of outcome measures for persons with the gene mutation who have not yet been diagnosed with HD. Many longitudinal studies of cognitive decline in prodromal HD have not stratified samples based on disease progression, thereby obscuring differences between symptomatic and nonsymptomatic individuals.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 110 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Researcher 17 15%
Other 15 13%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 17%
Neuroscience 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#21,431,531
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#6,398
of 8,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,333
of 243,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#48
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.