↓ Skip to main content

Drawing helps children to talk about their presenting problems during a mental health assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Drawing helps children to talk about their presenting problems during a mental health assessment
Published in
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, July 2013
DOI 10.1177/1359104513496261
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When children require mental health services, clinicians need to conduct assessments that are developmentally sensitive and that include the child's point of view. Drawing is a popular tool that is commonly used in clinical settings. Research on drawing in experimental settings has confirmed that the opportunity to draw while talking increases the amount of verbal information that children report during an interview. The present research examined whether drawing also facilitates children's self reports during a mental health assessment. A total of 33 5-12-year-old children were asked either to draw and tell about their presenting problem or to tell only. Children who drew and told provided twice as much verbal information as children who told only. Further, interviewers in the draw and tell condition used a greater number of minimal responses than did interviewers in the tell only condition. These data have important implications for clinical practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 41 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 43 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,756,074
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
#492
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,710
of 197,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.