↓ Skip to main content

Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in The Innovation, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
3 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives
Published in
The Innovation, August 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100691
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianjie Zhao, Sheng Wang, Chaojun Ouyang, Min Chen, Chenying Liu, Jin Zhang, Long Yu, Fei Wang, Yong Xie, Jun Li, Fang Wang, Sabine Grunwald, Bryan M. Wong, Fan Zhang, Zhen Qian, Yongjun Xu, Chengqing Yu, Wei Han, Tao Sun, Zezhi Shao, Tangwen Qian, Zhao Chen, Jiangyuan Zeng, Huai Zhang, Husi Letu, Bing Zhang, Li Wang, Lei Luo, Chong Shi, Hongjun Su, Hongsheng Zhang, Shuai Yin, Ni Huang, Wei Zhao, Nan Li, Chaolei Zheng, Yang Zhou, Changping Huang, Defeng Feng, Qingsong Xu, Yan Wu, Danfeng Hong, Zhenyu Wang, Yinyi Lin, Tangtang Zhang, Prashant Kumar, Antonio Plaza, Jocelyn Chanussot, Jiabao Zhang, Jiancheng Shi, Lizhe Wang

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 431 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 5%
Lecturer 22 5%
Student > Master 17 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 3%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 281 65%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 8%
Engineering 29 7%
Computer Science 24 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Environmental Science 9 2%
Other 44 10%
Unknown 279 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2026.
All research outputs
#4,288,917
of 33,130,212 outputs
Outputs from The Innovation
#313
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,797
of 327,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Innovation
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,130,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.