↓ Skip to main content

HIV/AIDS in the Rural United States: Epidemiology and Health Services Delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Care Research and Review, December 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HIV/AIDS in the Rural United States: Epidemiology and Health Services Delivery
Published in
Medical Care Research and Review, December 1995
DOI 10.1177/107755879505200401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin P Graham, Maureen L. Forrester, Jere A. Wysong, Thomas C. Rosenthal, Paul A. James

Abstract

This integrated research review addresses the epidemiology of rural human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and the organization, financing, and delivery of health services for rural persons living with HIV or AIDS (PLWHIVs, PLWAs). Several abstracting services, indexing services, and bibliographies were searched. An annotation form served as the guideline for data extraction. Several conclusions emerged from this review. Epidemiological evidence indicates that there has been a dramatic increase in the relative proportion of rural HIV/AIDS incident cases over the past 5 years. Explanations for the rural increase focus on injection drug use, heterosexual behavior, and sexually transmitted disease levels. Dramatically elevated rates of infection in rural Black women are indicated. Rural areas experience important levels of in-migration of HIV/AIDS-infected individuals. The health services literature suggests that rural providers and institutions have limited resources and little experience with PLWHIVs or PLWAs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 45%
Environmental Science 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#9,048,468
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Medical Care Research and Review
#437
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,083
of 81,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Care Research and Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them