↓ Skip to main content

Unexpected acoustic stimulation during action preparation reveals gradual re-specification of movement direction

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unexpected acoustic stimulation during action preparation reveals gradual re-specification of movement direction
Published in
Neuroscience, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.02.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A loud acoustic stimulus (LAS) is often used as a tool to investigate motor preparation in simple reaction time (RT) tasks, where all movement parameters are known in advance. In this report, we used a LAS to examinedirection specification in simple and choice RT tasks. This allowed us toinvestigatehow the specification of movement direction unfolds during the preparation period. In two experiments, participants responded to the appearance of an imperative stimulus (IS) with a ballistic wrist force directed towards one of two targets. In probe trials, a LAS (120 dBa) was delivered around the time of IS presentation. In Experiment 1, reaction times in the simple RT task were faster when the LAS was presented, but the effect on the movement kinematics was negligible. In the Choice RT task, however,movement direction variability increased when the LAS was presented. In Experiment 2, when we primed movements towards one direction, our analyses revealed that the longer participants took to start a movement, the more accurate their responses became. Our results show not only that movement direction reprogramming occurs quickly and continuously, but also that LAS can be a valuable tool to obtain meaningful readouts of the motor system's preparatory state.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 21%
Engineering 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#16,648,438
of 27,343,389 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience
#5,026
of 8,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,919
of 326,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience
#43
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,343,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.