↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric HIV Infection: A Neuropsychological and Educational Challenge

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Learning Disabilities, February 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pediatric HIV Infection: A Neuropsychological and Educational Challenge
Published in
Journal of Learning Disabilities, February 1993
DOI 10.1177/002221949302600202
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection will soon be the primary infectious cause of perinatally acquired developmental disabilities in the United States. HIV encephalopathy and a variety of opportunistic infections, neoplasms, and vascular changes associated with pediatric HIV infection create a high probability of neuropsychological impairment among preschool and school-age children infected perinatally. Although the use of antiretrovirals may moderate some of the functional difficulties faced by these children, specific neuropathological and neuropsychological deficits are likely to remain. Treatments that prevent the central nervous system (CNS) effects of HIV have yet to be identified. As the epidemic progresses among women of child-bearing age, well-controlled developmental studies are needed to further clarify the relationship between HIV and child development, and to aid professionals in developing appropriate, school-based educational plans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Psychology 8 19%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,814,919
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Learning Disabilities
#204
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,254
of 67,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Learning Disabilities
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.