↓ Skip to main content

SOCIAL NETWORKS AND PERCEPTIONS OF INTERGROUP CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIPS AND THIRD PARTIES.

Overview of attention for article published in Academy of Management Journal, February 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SOCIAL NETWORKS AND PERCEPTIONS OF INTERGROUP CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIPS AND THIRD PARTIES.
Published in
Academy of Management Journal, February 1998
DOI 10.2307/256897
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 328 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 40 11%
Student > Master 37 10%
Researcher 34 10%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 33 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 160 45%
Social Sciences 65 18%
Psychology 43 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 4%
Computer Science 9 3%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 38 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,448,169
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Academy of Management Journal
#1,356
of 1,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,604
of 93,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academy of Management Journal
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.