↓ Skip to main content

Patient-Reported Upper Extremity Outcome Measures Used in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient-Reported Upper Extremity Outcome Measures Used in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.022
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

(1) To identify English-language published patient-reported upper extremity outcome measures used in breast cancer research and (2) to examine construct validity and responsiveness in patient-reported upper extremity outcome measures used in breast cancer research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 54 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 22%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 61 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#10,246,570
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#2,932
of 7,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,721
of 241,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#41
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.