↓ Skip to main content

β-blockers: a new role in cancer chemotherapy?

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
β-blockers: a new role in cancer chemotherapy?
Published in
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, August 2013
DOI 10.1517/13543784.2013.825250
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

β-blockers are a class of drugs that are widely used in treating cardiac, respiratory and other ailments. They act by blocking β-adrenergic receptor-mediated signaling. Studies in various cancers have shown that patients taking a β-blocker have higher survival and lower recurrence and metastasis rates. This is supported by several preclinical and in vitro studies showing that adrenergic activation modulates apoptosis, promotes angiogenesis and other cancer hallmarks, and these effects can be abrogated by β-blockers. These studies provide a rationale for the use of β-blockers as adjuvants with cancer chemotherapy. However, all published studies so far are retrospective and most do not take into account the specific β-blocker used or address which is most likely to benefit cancer patients. The published epidemiological studies are correlative and have not examined the adrenergic receptor status of the tumors. Knowledge of the β-adrenergic receptor status of tumor cells is essential in choosing the best β-blocker for adjuvant therapy. A comprehensive, prospective study is necessary to definitively prove the utility of using β-blockers with chemotherapy and to identify the specific β-blocker most likely to benefit patients with cancer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,640,755
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
#1,708
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,393
of 202,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.