↓ Skip to main content

Rapid method for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in milk

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography A, August 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rapid method for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in milk
Published in
Journal of Chromatography A, August 1991
DOI 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)95940-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This method involved one step solvent extraction of milk with ethyl acetate-acetone-methanol by ultrasonication. The supernatants were further cleaned-up and enriched by solid-phase extraction using octadecyl (C18)-bonded silica cartridges, then assayed by capillary gas-liquid chromatography with electron capture detection. The recoveries of eleven organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) from raw milks were quantitative, ranging from 90-110% at 10 times the limit of detection (LOD). The LOD ranged from 0.5 micrograms/l whole milk for alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane to 2.5 micrograms/l whole milk for 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane. The day-to-day variation of the method was evaluated over 7 days using 3 different pools of spiked cow milks (at the LOD, 5 and 10 times the LOD). The coefficient of variations (C.V.s) were 16 +/- 6, 10 +/- 2 and 9 +/- 3% (mean S.D.), respectively. The method showed no emulsion problems common with conventional non-polar solvent extraction, and the use of solid-phase extraction considerably reduced the sample clean-up process compared with the existing methods. The method also showed that OCPs in milk could be extracted quantitatively without extraction of total fat, and that OCPs spiked into cows milk could be used to construct calibration curves for human milk determinations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Researcher 2 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography A
#3,127
of 12,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,969
of 18,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography A
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.