↓ Skip to main content

High Rates of Ocd Symptom Misidentification by Mental Health Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd), August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High Rates of Ocd Symptom Misidentification by Mental Health Professionals
Published in
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd), August 2013
DOI 10.1177/104012371302500306
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly Glazier, Rachelle M. Calixte, Rachel Rothschild, Anthony Pinto

Abstract

More than a decade may pass between the onset of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms and initiation of treatment. One explanation may be health care professionals' limited awareness of OCD symptom presentations. We assessed mental health care providers' ability to identify taboo thoughts as manifestations of OCD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 38 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2026.
All research outputs
#2,274,615
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#32
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,519
of 243,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them