↓ Skip to main content

Do-it-yourself brain stimulation: a regulatory model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Do-it-yourself brain stimulation: a regulatory model
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2013
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2013-101692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,918,988
of 27,391,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1,900
of 3,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,970
of 214,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#21
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,391,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.