↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Steroid hormone (20-hydroxyecdysone) modulates the acquisition of aversive olfactory memories in pollen forager honeybees
Published in
Learning & Memory, July 2013
DOI 10.1101/lm.030825.113
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Here, we examine effects of the steroid hormone, 20-hydroxyecdysone (20-E), on associative olfactory learning in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. 20-E impaired the bees' ability to associate odors with punishment during aversive conditioning, but did not interfere with their ability to associate odors with a food reward (appetitive learning). The steroid had a significant impact also on the expression of amine-receptor genes in centers of the brain involved in the formation and recall of associative olfactory memories (mushroom bodies). 20-E increased expression of the dopamine receptor gene, Amdop2, and reduced the expression of the putative dopamine/ecdysone receptor gene, Amgpcr19. Interestingly, Amgpcr19 tended to be highly expressed in the brains of foragers that exhibited strong aversive learning, but expressed at lower levels in bees that performed well in appetitive learning assays. In 2-d-old bees, transcript levels of the same gene could be reduced by queen mandibular pheromone, a pheromone that blocks aversive learning in young worker bees. As ecdysteroid levels rise to a peak ∼2 d after adult emergence and then fall to low levels in foragers, we examined aversive learning also in young worker bees. Aversive learning performance in 2-d-old bees was consistently poor. The results of this study indicate that learning in honeybees can be modulated by ecdysteroids. They highlight, in addition, a potential involvement of the putative dopamine/ecdysone receptor, AmGPCR19, in hormonal regulation of associative olfactory learning in the honeybee.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 37%
Neuroscience 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Psychology 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Memory
#761
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,647
of 206,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Memory
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.