Ok, then back to Protzko et al. The real replication rate they observed, with ordinary analyses (and not the fanciful ones that were claimed to be pre-registered and weren't) was not 90%, as you think, but at best 70% (see https://t.co/inZf1vdaM9 and …
https://t.co/Sv1MGDQXZ4 OSFに類似したタイトルの記事はありました。 https://t.co/dtzS6PaNR3
🔵Oslo Monday, 14 October, 14:00 CEST Topic: Bak-Coleman & Devezer (2024). Claims about scientific rigour require rigour, https://t.co/dN2R4hqCKQ Retraction of: Protzko et al (2024). More details: https://t.co/DVYrA7C3Fu
https://t.co/TJZqpa2vo8 Very interesting paper, critically evaluating an important recent study. You should measure your work using the same rule you judge others!