One hundred thirty-six patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were studied retrospectively to determine prognostic factors for survival. In the regression analysis, three variables were statistically significantly related to survival: smoking history, tumor size, and node status. Smokers had a 6.3 times greater risk than nonsmokers, node positivity imparted an 8.3 times greater risk than node negativity, and for each 1-cm increase in the size of the tumor, the risk of death increased by 46%. A relative decrease in survival in smokers was observed, despite a younger age and fewer positive nodes at diagnosis compared to nonsmokers. Increased surveillance in these patients may be warranted.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology
#2,631
of 6,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,949
of 81,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
