↓ Skip to main content

The neurophysiology of brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Neurophysiology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
20 patents

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The neurophysiology of brain injury
Published in
Clinical Neurophysiology, January 2004
DOI 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00258-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article reviews the mechanisms and pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research on the pathophysiology of diffuse and focal TBI is reviewed with an emphasis on damage that occurs at the cellular level. The mechanisms of injury are discussed in detail including the factors and time course associated with mild to severe diffuse injury as well as the pathophysiology of focal injuries. Examples of electrophysiologic procedures consistent with recent theory and research evidence are presented. Acceleration/deceleration (A/D) forces rarely cause shearing of nervous tissue, but instead, initiate a pathophysiologic process with a well defined temporal progression. The injury foci are considered to be diffuse trauma to white matter with damage occurring at the superficial layers of the brain, and extending inward as A/D forces increase. Focal injuries result in primary injuries to neurons and the surrounding cerebrovasculature, with secondary damage occurring due to ischemia and a cytotoxic cascade. A subset of electrophysiologic procedures consistent with current TBI research is briefly reviewed. The pathophysiology of TBI occurs over time, in a pattern consistent with the physics of injury. The development of electrophysiologic procedures designed to detect specific patterns of change related to TBI may be of most use to the neurophysiologist. This article provides an up-to-date review of the mechanisms and pathophysiology of TBI and attempts to address misconceptions in the existing literature.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Canada 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 401 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 17%
Researcher 64 15%
Student > Master 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 87 20%
Unknown 82 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 21%
Neuroscience 62 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 10%
Psychology 37 9%
Engineering 36 8%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 95 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,087,116
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neurophysiology
#717
of 5,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,138
of 156,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neurophysiology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.