You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phylogenetic conservatism in plant phenology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ecology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.12154 |
| Authors |
T. Jonathan Davies, Elizabeth M. Wolkovich, Nathan J. B. Kraft, Nicolas Salamin, Jenica M. Allen, Toby R. Ault, Julio L. Betancourt, Kjell Bolmgren, Elsa E. Cleland, Benjamin I. Cook, Theresa M. Crimmins, Susan J. Mazer, Gregory J. McCabe, Stephanie Pau, Jim Regetz, Mark D. Schwartz, Steven E. Travers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 373 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 22% |
| Researcher | 78 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 224 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 64 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 86 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,606,369
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#851
of 3,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,240
of 226,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#11
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.