↓ Skip to main content

35 years after CLIA 1988: Key insights and policy implications among laboratory professionals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
35 years after CLIA 1988: Key insights and policy implications among laboratory professionals
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2024
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0311251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,097,072
of 29,701,924 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,179
of 255,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,632
of 321,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#92
of 3,834 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,701,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,834 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.