Although adjuvant therapy (AT) is a necessary component of multimodality therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its application can be hindered by post-pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) complications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of post-PD complications on AT utilization and overall survival (OS).
Patients undergoing PD without neoadjuvant therapy for stages I-III PDAC at a single institution (2007-2015) were evaluated. Ninety-day postoperative major complications (PMCs) were defined as grade ≥3. Records were linked to the Kentucky Cancer Registry for AT/OS data. Early AT was given <8 wk; late 8-16 wk. Initiation >16 wk was not considered to be AT. Complication effects on AT timing/utilization and OS were evaluated.
Of 93 consecutive patients treated with surgery upfront with AT data, 64 (69%) received AT (41 [44%] early; 23 [25%] late). There were 32 patients (34%) with low-grade complications and 24 (26%) with PMC. With PMC, only six of 24 patients (25%) received early AT and 13 of 24 (54%) received any (early/late) AT versus 35 of 69 (51%) early AT and 51 of 69 (74%) any AT without PMC. PMCs were associated with worse median OS (7.1 versus 24.6 mo, without PMC, P < 0.001). Independent predictors of OS included AT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48), tumor >2 cm (HR: 3.39), node-positivity (HR: 2.16), and PMC (HR: 3.69, all P < 0.02).
Independent of AT utilization and biologic factors, PMC negatively impacted OS in patients treated with surgery first. These data suggest that strategies to decrease PMC and treatment sequencing alternatives to increase multimodality therapy rates may improve oncologic outcomes for PDAC.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Research
#4,133
of 5,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,724
of 337,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Research
#57
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
