You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of the in Situ and Desorption Sediment−Water Partitioning of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, December 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es950218z |
| Authors |
Susan E. McGroddy, John W. Farrington, Philip M. Gschwend |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 27% |
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 49% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2002.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#6,056
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,924
of 80,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.