↓ Skip to main content

Fate of acetone in water

Overview of attention for article published in Chemosphere, January 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fate of acetone in water
Published in
Chemosphere, January 1982
DOI 10.1016/0045-6535(82)90114-x
Authors

Ronald E. Rathbun, Doyle W. Stephens, David J. Shultz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 43%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 1994.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Chemosphere
#3,246
of 13,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,358
of 30,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemosphere
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.