Neurological Monitoring and Management for Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Consensus Guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, November 2024

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 10 X users

facebook: 4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley: 19 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Neurological Monitoring and Management for Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Consensus Guidelines
Published in	ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, November 2024
DOI	10.1097/mat.0000000000002312
Pubmed ID	39620302
Authors	Sung-Min Cho, Jaeho Hwang, Giovanni Chiarini, Marwa Amer, Marta Velia Antonini, Nicholas Barrett, Jan Belohlavek, Jason E. Blatt, Daniel Brodie, Heidi J. Dalton, Rodrigo Diaz, Alyaa Elhazmi, Pouya Tahsili-Fahadan, Jonathon Fanning, John Fraser, Aparna Hoskote, Jae-Seung Jung, Christopher Lotz, Graeme MacLaren, Giles Peek, Angelo Polito, Jan Pudil, Lakshmi Raman, Kollengode Ramanathan, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Daniel Rob, Leonardo Salazar Rojas, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Glenn Whitman, Akram M. Zaaqoq, Roberto Lorusso

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Japan	3	30%
Italy	1	10%
United Kingdom	1	10%
United States	1	10%
Unknown	4	40%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	8	80%
Scientists	2	20%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	19	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Other	3	16%
Unspecified	1	5%
Student > Ph. D. Student	1	5%
Student > Bachelor	1	5%
Student > Master	1	5%
Other	0	0%
Unknown	12	63%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Nursing and Health Professions	2	11%
Unspecified	1	5%
Computer Science	1	5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	1	5%
Neuroscience	1	5%
Other	1	5%
Unknown	12	63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2025.

All research outputs

#6,538,323

of 34,575,175 outputs

Outputs from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs

#753

of 3,575 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#72,503

of 407,684 outputs

Outputs of similar age from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs

of 24 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.