↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Actions of the endocrine disruptor methoxychlor and its estrogenic metabolite on in vitro embryonic rat seminiferous cord formation and perinatal testis growth
Published in
Reproductive Toxicology, May 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0890-6238(01)00124-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current study examines the actions of methoxychlor and its estrogenic metabolite, 2, 2-bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1, 1, 1-trichloroethane (HPTE), on seminiferous cord formation and growth of the developing rat testis. The developing testis in the embryonic and early postnatal period is likely more sensitive to hormonally active agents than at later stages of development. Embryonic day 13 (E13) testis organ cultures were treated with either 0.2, 2, or 20 microM methoxychlor or 1, 3, 6, 15, 30, or 60 microM HPTE to examine effects on cord formation. No concentration of methoxychlor completely inhibited cord formation. However, cord formation was abnormal with the presence of a reduced number of cords and appearance of "swollen" cords at the 2 and 20 microM concentrations of methoxychlor. The swollen cords were due to an increase in the number of cells in a cord cross section and reduction of interstitial cell numbers between cords. Treatment of embryonic day 13 (E13) testes with HPTE caused abnormal cord formation at the 3 microM and 6 microM concentrations, and completely inhibited cord formation at the 15, 30, and 60 microM concentrations. In addition to the estrogenic metabolite HTPE, methoxychlor can also be metabolized into anti-androgenic compounds. Therefore, to determine the spectrum of potential actions of methoxychlor on testis development, different concentrations of estradiol, testosterone, and an anti-androgen (flutamide) were utilized to determine their effects on E13 testis organ culture morphology. Estradiol (1 microM) and flutamide (0.1microM) both inhibited seminiferous cord formation in E13 testis organ cultures. Therefore, methoxychlor may be acting through the androgen and/or estrogen receptors to elicit its actions on seminiferous cord formation. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (RT-PCR) confirmed the presence of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) mRNA from embryonic day 14 (E14) through postnatal day 5 (P5) while estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) mRNA did not appear until approximately E16 of testis development. Androgen receptor (AR) expression was present from E14 through P5 of testis development, but at apparently reduced levels at E14 and E16. Immunohistochemical analysis localized ERalpha to the cells of the seminiferous cords at E14 though P5 while ERbeta was present in cells of the interstitium at E16 and P0. Androgen receptor was localized to germ and interstitial cells. The effects of methoxychlor, HPTE, estradiol, and testosterone on cell growth of perinatal testes was determined with a thymidine incorporation assay in postnatal day zero (P0) testis cell cultures. Methoxychlor (0.002, 0.02, and 0.2 microM) and HPTE (2 and 20 microM) stimulated thymidine incorporation in P0 testis cell cultures in a similar manner to estradiol (0.01, 0.1, and 1 microM). In addition, testosterone (0.1 microM) also stimulated thymidine incorporation in P0 testis cultures. Observations suggest that methoxychlor and its metabolite HPTE can alter normal embryonic testis development and growth. The actions of methoxychlor and HPTE are likely mediated in part through the steroid receptors confirmed to be present in the developing testis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Chile 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Professor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,584,775
of 28,667,723 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Toxicology
#266
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,530
of 48,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Toxicology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,667,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them