↓ Skip to main content

Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: a response to Fox

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
562 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: a response to Fox
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
Brazil 5 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 524 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 22%
Student > Master 89 16%
Researcher 71 13%
Student > Bachelor 69 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 5%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 88 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 248 44%
Environmental Science 156 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 1%
Social Sciences 6 1%
Other 20 4%
Unknown 105 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,663,260
of 32,969,305 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#855
of 3,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,966
of 231,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,969,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.