Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, March 2017

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 4 blogs
twitter: 35 X users
peer_reviews: 1 peer review site

facebook: 1 Facebook page
q&a: 1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley: 47 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 40 X posts from 35 X users, with an upper bound of 299,448 followers.

Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation "This indicates that peer review could contribute to increasing the quality even of rejected manuscripts." https:/…

Assessing Peer Review by Gauging the Fate of Rejected Manuscripts: the Case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation https://t.co/Cr1ZFedvt7

RT @MCSeto: Very interesting and fits my experience: Peer review can strengthen rejected papers; most rejections will appear in lower-impac…

Very interesting and fits my experience: Peer review can strengthen rejected papers; most rejections will appear in lower-impact journals. https://t.co/nK38AGOPQD

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 36 additional X posts.