You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis for kidney failure: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01859-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin W M Vernooij, Carinna Hockham, Giovanni Strippoli, Suetonia Green, Jörgen Hegbrant, Andrew Davenport, Claudia Barth, Bernard Canaud, Mark Woodward, Peter J Blankestijn, Michiel L Bots, Peter J Blankestijn, Robin WM Vernooij, Carinna Hockham, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Bernard Canaud, Jörgen Hegbrant, Claudia Barth, Krister Cromm, Andrew Davenport, Matthias Rose, Marietta Török, Mark Woodward, Michiel Bots, Peter J Blankestijn, Michiel L Bots, Bernard Canaud, Andrew Davenport, Muriel PC Grooteman, Fatih Kircelli, Franco Locatelli, Francisco Maduell, Marion Morena, Menso J Nubé, Ercan Ok, Ferran Torres, Mark Woodward |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2026.
All research outputs
#1,072,830
of 34,612,600 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7,986
of 52,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,622
of 353,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#76
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,612,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.