↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Yoga on Menstrual Disorders: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Effect of Yoga on Menstrual Disorders: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1089/acm.2016.0363
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To summarize and evaluate evidence for the effect of yoga on menstrual disorders. PubMed, CINAHL/MEDLINE, Web of Science, AMED, and Scopus were searched for English-language literature relevant to the review question. All primary research studies were included. Fifteen studies described in 18 papers were included in the review. A range of yoga interventions were used. Some studies used a combination of Asana, Pranayama, and other yogic relaxation or meditation techniques. All included studies reported some change in their outcome measures, suggesting reduced symptoms of menstrual distress following a yoga intervention; however, the heterogeneity and intensity of the interventions and outcome measures meant that findings have limited generalizability and applicability in practice settings. Further research on the relationship between yoga practice and menstrual disorders is warranted, but there must be both consistency in the methods, measures, and quality of studies and a shift toward research on yoga practices that are replicable outside of the clinical trial setting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 7 4%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 76 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Psychology 9 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 79 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#475,001
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#111
of 2,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,538
of 346,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.