↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of IOL power calculation methods and intraoperative wavefront aberrometer in eyes after refractive surgery.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Refractive Surgery, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of IOL power calculation methods and intraoperative wavefront aberrometer in eyes after refractive surgery.
Published in
Journal of Refractive Surgery, July 2013
DOI 10.3928/1081597x-20130617-07
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To compare preoperative methods for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power versus the intraoperative wavefront aberrometer in eyes with a history of refractive surgery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#10,712,231
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Refractive Surgery
#396
of 1,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,271
of 240,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Refractive Surgery
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.