↓ Skip to main content

Structural MRI Changes of the Brain in Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structural MRI Changes of the Brain in Depression
Published in
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, January 2004
DOI 10.1177/155005940403500111
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

For many years, investigators have been trying to identify the neuroanatomical structures responsible for the development of neuropsychiatric disorders, specifically depression and schizophreniform disorders. The available data were based on observations made in neurological patients who developed a psychiatric comorbid disorder following the neurologic insult. With the advances in high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and functional neuroimaging studies, we have witnessed in the last decade a wealth of new data that identify structural neuroimaging changes in mesial temporal structures, prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia in major depressive disorders. The purpose of this article is to briefly review the published data on neuroanatomical structural changes associated with major depressive and bipolar disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,073,834
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
#238
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,825
of 147,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them