↓ Skip to main content

Refinement of late-Early and Middle Miocene diatom biostratigraphy for the East Coast of the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Geosphere, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Refinement of late-Early and Middle Miocene diatom biostratigraphy for the East Coast of the United States
Published in
Geosphere, January 2013
DOI 10.1130/ges00864.1
Authors

John A. Barron, James Browning, Peter Sugarman, Kenneth G. Miller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 73%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2013.
All research outputs
#4,369,063
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Geosphere
#491
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,764
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geosphere
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.