↓ Skip to main content

Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131 (ST131) Subclone H30 as an Emergent Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen Among US Veterans

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
video
1 YouTube creator
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131 (ST131) Subclone H30 as an Emergent Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen Among US Veterans
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2013
DOI 10.1093/cid/cit503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aylin Colpan, Brian Johnston, Stephen Porter, Connie Clabots, Ruth Anway, Lao Thao, Michael A. Kuskowski, Veronika Tchesnokova, Evgeni V. Sokurenko, James R. Johnson, on behalf of the VICTORY Investigators, Bradley L. Allen, Gio J. Baracco, Roger Bedimo, Mary Bessesen, Robert A. Bonomo, Stephen M. Brecher, Sheldon T. Brown, Laila Castellino, Arundhati S. Desai, Fletcher Fernau, Mark A. Fisher, James Fleckenstein, Carol S. Fleming, Narla J. Fries, Virginia L. Kan, Carol A. Kauffman, Stacey Klutts, Michael Ohl, Thomas Russo, Andrea Swiatlo, Edwin Swiatlo

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 12 7%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 48 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,452,862
of 34,324,933 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#6,423
of 21,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,166
of 241,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#50
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,324,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.