↓ Skip to main content

NMNATs, evolutionarily conserved neuronal maintenance factors

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Neurosciences, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NMNATs, evolutionarily conserved neuronal maintenance factors
Published in
Trends in Neurosciences, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.tins.2013.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Proper brain function requires neuronal homeostasis over a range of environmental challenges. Neuronal activity, injury, and aging stress the nervous system, and lead to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration. Nevertheless, most organisms maintain healthy neurons throughout life, implying the existence of active maintenance mechanisms. Recent studies have revealed a key neuronal maintenance and protective function for nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyl transferases (NMNATs). We review evidence that NMNATs protect neurons through multiple mechanisms in different contexts, and highlight functions that either require or are independent of NMNAT catalytic activity. We then summarize data supporting a role for NMNATs in neuronal maintenance and raise intriguing questions on how NMNATs preserve neuronal integrity and facilitate proper neural function throughout life.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 145 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 26%
Neuroscience 31 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Neurosciences
#2,349
of 2,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,901
of 210,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Neurosciences
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.