↓ Skip to main content

Effective Access to Multivalent Inhibitors of Carbonic Anhydrases Promoted by Peptide Bioconjugation

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effective Access to Multivalent Inhibitors of Carbonic Anhydrases Promoted by Peptide Bioconjugation
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/chem.201700241
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Multivalency has impressive effects on (bio)molecular recognition, through the simultaneous presentation of multiple copies of a ligand, which can change a weak millimolar binder into a potent nanomolar one. The implementation of multivalency in enzyme inhibition is rather recent, being exemplified by few serendipitous discoveries, and hitherto relying on the random exploration of new multivalent structures as potential enzyme inhibitors. We report here a straightforward and versatile method that enables the construction of multivalent systems for the inhibition of carbonic anhydrases (CA), widespread enzymes that catalyse a fundamental biochemical reaction. Oxime and hydrazone click-type bioconjugation techniques were successfully used for the preparation of tetravalent peptide conjugates tethered with sulphonamide CA inhibitors. The enzyme inhibition assays show that multivalent effects were present with these novel compounds, but also reveal various structural effects provided by the scaffolds. The versatility of this approach may facilitate the exploration of structure-activity relationships for various types of other enzyme inhibitors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Student > Master 4 20%
Lecturer 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2017.
All research outputs
#23,302,843
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#17,747
of 29,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,285
of 352,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#233
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,576 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.