↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nonoperative Strategy (Watchful Waiting) for Men With Minimally Symptomatic Inguinal Hernias
Published in
Annals of Surgery, September 2013
DOI 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a19725
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the long-term crossover (CO) rate in men undergoing watchful waiting (WW) as a primary treatment strategy for their asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 217 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 16%
Other 30 13%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 60 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 75 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2025.
All research outputs
#1,480,500
of 31,723,272 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#845
of 11,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,078
of 232,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#8
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,723,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.