↓ Skip to main content

Can FDG-PET reduce the need for mediastinoscopy in potentially resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer?

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can FDG-PET reduce the need for mediastinoscopy in potentially resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer?
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, February 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03432-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 63%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#4,112
of 10,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,368
of 144,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#18
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.