↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy and pitfalls of multidetector-row computed tomography in detecting spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Accuracy and pitfalls of multidetector-row computed tomography in detecting spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, March 2010
DOI 10.3171/2009.9.spine0971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 28%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 69%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,083,864
of 33,979,905 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
#1,165
of 2,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,663
of 142,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,979,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.