↓ Skip to main content

Differential effects of lidocaine and remifentanil on response to the tracheal tube during emergence from general anaesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differential effects of lidocaine and remifentanil on response to the tracheal tube during emergence from general anaesthesia
Published in
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, January 2011
DOI 10.1093/bja/aeq396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Other 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 58%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2012.
All research outputs
#12,428,062
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#5,068
of 8,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,944
of 253,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#28
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.