↓ Skip to main content

Early Impact Of CareFirst’s Patient-Centered Medical Home With Strong Financial Incentives

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Early Impact Of CareFirst’s Patient-Centered Medical Home With Strong Financial Incentives
Published in
Health Affairs, March 2017
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1321
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 2011 CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, a large mid-Atlantic health insurance plan, implemented a payment and delivery system reform program. The model, called the Total Care and Cost Improvement Program, includes enhanced payments for primary care, significant financial incentives for primary care physicians to control spending, and care coordination tools to support progress toward the goal of higher-quality and lower-cost patient care. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the initiative's first three years. Our quantitative analyses used spending and utilization data for 2010-13 to compare enrollees who received care from participating physician groups to similar enrollees cared for by nonparticipating groups. Savings were small and fully shared with providers, which suggests no significant effect on total spending (including bonuses). Our qualitative analysis suggested that early in the program, many physicians were not fully engaged with the initiative and did not make full use of its tools. These findings imply that this and similar payment reforms may require greater time to realize significant savings than many stakeholders had expected. Patience may be necessary if payer-led reform is going to lead to system transformation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2025.
All research outputs
#324,351
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#720
of 6,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,536
of 342,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#21
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.