↓ Skip to main content

Assessing treatments used to reduce rumination and/or worry: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
528 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing treatments used to reduce rumination and/or worry: A systematic review
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Perseverative cognitions such as rumination and worry are key components of mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety. Given the frequent comorbidity of conditions in which rumination and worry are present, it is possible that they are underpinned by the same cognitive process. Furthermore, rumination and worry appear to be part of a causal chain that can lead to long-term health consequences, including cardiovascular disease and other chronic conditions. It is important therefore to understand what interventions may be useful in reducing their incidence. This systematic review aimed to assess treatments used to reduce worry and/or rumination. As we were interested in understanding the current treatment landscape, we limited our search from 2002 to 2012. Nineteen studies were included in the review and were assessed for methodological quality and treatment integrity. Results suggested that mindfulness-based and cognitive behavioural interventions may be effective in the reduction of both rumination and worry; with both Internet-delivered and face-to-face delivered formats useful. More broadly, it appears that treatments in which participants are encouraged to change their thinking style, or to disengage from emotional response to rumination and/or worry (e.g., through mindful techniques), could be helpful. Implications for treatment and avenues for future research are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 515 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 15%
Student > Bachelor 66 13%
Researcher 49 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 8%
Other 77 15%
Unknown 112 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 277 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 8%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 2%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 35 7%
Unknown 141 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2026.
All research outputs
#345,780
of 34,302,672 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#89
of 1,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,093
of 243,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,302,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.