↓ Skip to main content

Does observer bias contribute to variations in the rate of retinopathy of prematurity between centres?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does observer bias contribute to variations in the rate of retinopathy of prematurity between centres?
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, February 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01652.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A Darlow, Mark J Elder, L John Horwood, Deborah A Donoghue, David J Henderson‐Smart, on behalf of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2009.
All research outputs
#9,386,806
of 27,367,745 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#400
of 1,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,339
of 103,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,367,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.