↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative Phase-Change Thermodynamics and Metastability of Perovskite-Phase Cesium Lead Iodide

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantitative Phase-Change Thermodynamics and Metastability of Perovskite-Phase Cesium Lead Iodide
Published in
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, March 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00134
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The perovskite phase of cesium lead iodide (α-CsPbI3 or "black" phase), possesses favorable optoelectronic properties for photovoltaic applications. However, the stable phase at room temperature is a non-functional, "yellow" phase (δ-CsPbI3). Herein, black phase polycrystalline thin films are synthesized above 330°C and rapidly quenched to room temperature, retaining their phase in a metastable state. Using differential scanning calorimetry, it is shown herein that the metastable state is maintained in the absence of moisture, up to a temperature of 100°C and a reversible phase-change enthalpy of 14.2 (± 0.5) kJ/mol is observed. The presence of atmospheric moisture hastens the black-to-yellow conversion kinetics without significantly changing the enthalpy of the transition, indicating a catalytic effect, rather than a change in equilibrium due to water adduct formation. These results delineate the conditions for trapping the desired phase and highlight the significant magnitude of the entropic stabilization of this phase.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 209 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 31%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 49 23%
Chemistry 39 18%
Physics and Astronomy 26 12%
Energy 13 6%
Engineering 13 6%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 58 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#27,205,565
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#7,213
of 9,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,785
of 342,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#98
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.