↓ Skip to main content

Predicting the requirement for N-acetylcysteine in paracetamol poisoning from reported dose

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Toxicology (15563650), August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting the requirement for N-acetylcysteine in paracetamol poisoning from reported dose
Published in
Clinical Toxicology (15563650), August 2013
DOI 10.3109/15563650.2013.830733
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is contention over whether reported dose correlates with toxicity in paracetamol poisoning and risk assessment is currently based on serum paracetamol concentration compared to a nomogram, irrespective of reported dose. Objective. To determine if reported dose predicts the need for N-acetylcysteine (NAC).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,008,741
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#796
of 2,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,265
of 244,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.