↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia: The Second Decade

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia: The Second Decade
Published in
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, March 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Postgraduate 9 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#9,259,343
of 27,145,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#2,450
of 4,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,007
of 124,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#25
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,145,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.