↓ Skip to main content

Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy, Second Edition

Overview of attention for article published in Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy, Second Edition
Published in
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1089/tmj.2011.0075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen K Li, Mark Horton, Sven-Erik Bursell, Jerry Cavallerano, Ingrid Zimmer-Galler, Mathew Tennant, Michael Abramoff, Edward Chaum, Debra Cabrera Debuc, Tom Leonard-Martin, Marc Winchester, Mary G Lawrence, Wendell Bauman, W Kelly Gardner, Lloyd Hildebran, Jay Federman

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 40 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 38%
Computer Science 9 7%
Engineering 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 44 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#12,425,845
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#1,020
of 2,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,821
of 183,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.