You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioengineered Human Arteries for the Repair of Vascular Injuries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, February 2025
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ernest E. Moore, Michael Curi, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Kundi, Ying Wei Lum, Charles J. Fox, Ravi R. Rajani, Todd E. Rasmussen, Oleksandr Sokolov, Laura E. Niklason, Zakaria Khondker, Shamik J. Parikh, Rishi Kundi, Jonathan Morrison, Megan Brenner, Ying Wei Lum, Jaimie Shores, Ravi Rajani, Nicholas Namias, Ernest Moore, Charles Fox, Michael Curi, Roy Fujitani, Gregory Magee, Philip Batista, Jose Trani, Lawrence Oresanya, Lars Sjoholm, Aurelia Calero, Mark Seamon, Mahmoud Malas, Darrin Clouse, Thomas Naslund, Martin Schreiber, Rachael Callcut, Oscar Grandas, David Skarupa, Kevin Southerland, Carl Freeman, Todd Rasmussen, Justin Hurie, Ilya Goldin, Tony Karram, George Greenberg, Moshe Halak, Oleksandr Sokolov, Vasyl Shaprynskyi, Oleh Skupyy, Serhii Yurets, Oleksandr Stanko |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 39% |
| India | 2 | 11% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2025.
All research outputs
#211,208
of 34,407,356 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#199
of 4,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,778
of 417,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#4
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,407,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.