↓ Skip to main content

Game target‐group: Implementing inhomogeneous Poisson point process to estimate animal abundance from harvest data

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
bluesky
6 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Game target‐group: Implementing inhomogeneous Poisson point process to estimate animal abundance from harvest data
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2024
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.14458
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 35%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2025.
All research outputs
#5,006,245
of 30,598,342 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,705
of 2,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,089
of 369,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,598,342 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.