↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gadolinium released by the linear gadolinium-based contrast-agent Gd-DTPA decreases the activity of human epithelial Na+ channels (ENaCs)
Published in
BBA - Biomembranes, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.02.019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gadolinium-based-contrast-agents (GBCAs) are used for magnetic-resonance-imaging and associated with renal and cardiovascular adverse reactions caused by released Gd(3+) ions. Gd(3+) is also a modulator of mechano-gated ion channels, including the epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC) that is expressed in kidney epithelium and the vasculature. ENaC is important for salt-/water homeostasis and blood pressure regulation and a likely target of released Gd(3+) from GBCAs causing the above-mentioned adverse reactions. Therefore this study examined the effect of Gd(3+) and GBCAs on ENaC's activity. Human αβγENaC was expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and exposed to Gd(3+), linear (Gd-DTPA, Magnevist) or cyclic (Dotarem) GBCAs. Transmembrane ion-currents (IM) were recorded by the two-electrode-voltage-clamp technique and Gd(3+)-release by Gd-DTPA was confirmed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Gd(3+) exerts biphasic effects on ENaC's activity: ≤0.3mmol/l decreased IM which was preventable by DEPC (modifies histidines). Strikingly Gd(3+)≥0.4mmol/l increased IM and this effect was prevented by cysteine-modifying MTSEA. Linear Gd-DTPA and Magnevist mimicked the effect of ≤0.3mmol/l Gd(3+), whereas the chelator DTPA showed no effect. Gd(3+) and Gd-DTPA increased the IC50 for amiloride, but did not affect ENaC's self-inhibition. Interestingly, cyclic Gd-DOTA (Dotarem) increased IM to a similar extent as its chelator DOTA, suggesting that the chelator rather than released Gd(3+) is responsible for this effect. These results confirm Gd(3+)-release from linear Gd-DTPA and indicate that the released Gd(3+) amount is sufficient to interfere with ENaC's activity to provide putative explanations for GBCA-related adverse effects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#9,563,489
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from BBA - Biomembranes
#1,593
of 5,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,265
of 352,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BBA - Biomembranes
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.