↓ Skip to main content

Animal Models in Neuropsychiatry: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Moral Costs?

Overview of attention for article published in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
bluesky
3 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Animal Models in Neuropsychiatry: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Moral Costs?
Published in
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, November 2022
DOI 10.1017/s0963180122000147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2025.
All research outputs
#5,861,380
of 32,604,254 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
#130
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,556
of 528,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,604,254 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.