↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive experimental fitness landscape and evolutionary network for small RNA

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comprehensive experimental fitness landscape and evolutionary network for small RNA
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1307604110
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The origin of life is believed to have progressed through an RNA world, in which RNA acted as both genetic material and functional molecules. The structure of the evolutionary fitness landscape of RNA would determine natural selection for the first functional sequences. Fitness landscapes are the subject of much speculation, but their structure is essentially unknown. Here we describe a comprehensive map of a fitness landscape, exploring nearly all of sequence space, for short RNAs surviving selection in vitro. With the exception of a small evolutionary network, we find that fitness peaks are largely isolated from one another, highlighting the importance of historical contingency and indicating that natural selection would be constrained to local exploration in the RNA world.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
France 4 2%
Poland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 222 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 29%
Researcher 51 21%
Student > Master 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 33 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 26%
Chemistry 17 7%
Physics and Astronomy 13 5%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 40 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,409,614
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#36,246
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,051
of 245,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#378
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.